Critical Thinking for the Common Good
We Champion Scholarly Excellence and Moral Responsibility
Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies, Regent College
Modern Technology and the Diminishment of the Human
Thursday, September 26, 2019, 4:00 p.m., Woodward (IRC) Room 3
Audio File of Craig’s Lecture
From the plow to the printing press, technologies have repeatedly revolutionized human life and shaped our understanding of our purposes and possibilities. Recent advances in automatic machine technology have further revolutionized our understanding of the human prospect. Yet have recent technological developments actually encouraged embodied human flourishing? By exploring the implications of the Christian doctrines of creation, incarnation, and resurrection, Dr. Gay retrieves a foundation from which to evaluate and critique modern technological development without asking us to unplug completely.
Craig Gay lectures in the area of Christianity, Society, and Culture, and directs Regent’s ThM degree program. He is the author of With Liberty or Justice for Whom?,Eerdmans, 1991, The Way of the (Modern) World,Eerdmans, 1998; Cash Values: The Value of Money the Nature of Worth,Eerdmans, 2004; Dialogue, Catalogue and Monologue,Regent College Publishing, 2008; and Modern Technology and the Human Future: A Christian Appraisal, IVP Academic, 2018. Craig was the co-editor (with C. Peter Molloy) of The Way of Truth in the Present Age, Regent College, 1999. He has contributed chapters to a number of collections on the subjects of modernity, secularization, economic ethics, and technology, and his articles and reviews have appeared in Christian Scholar’s Review, American Journal of Sociology, Crux, and Markets & Morality.
Co-sponsored with Canadian Scientific and Christian Affiliation
From the beginning, machine technology was developed to function automatically…. designed and deployed to function independently of unauthorized human interference and unimpeded by human frailties, inconsistencies, and irrationalities…. Modern technological development has as a result been moving away from ordinary embodied human existence for some time…. From within the technological [machine] worldview, human embodiment is simply not a particularly high priority. This, I want to suggest, betrays serious confusion about the nature of the created order as well as confusion about the human place and task within the created order.
Other Scholars interested in Technology and Culture
Next in GFCF: November 20, 2019 June Francis, Associate Professor of Marketing at the SFU Beedie School of Business; Director of the Sustainable Development Program in the Faculty of Environment.
Rethinking Our Narrative of Diversity: Collaboration for Social Transformation
4:00 pm Woodward (IRC) Room 6
- January 22, 2020 Dr. Gordon Carkner and Two UBC Doctoral Students
Charles Taylor and the Shaping of the Modern Identity
- March 11, 2020, Raymond C. Aldred, Director of the Indigenous Studies Program and Professor of Indigenous Theologyat the Vancouver School of Theology
Can We Handle the Truth and Take Responsibility for Reconciliation?
James Davison Hunter, Science and the Good: The Tragic Quest for the Foundations of Morality.
David Brooks, The Second Mountain: Quest for Moral Life.
Lunch Discussion with Cambridge Poet-Theologian Malcolm Guite
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
The Poetic Imagination: a Way of Seeing Reality More Clearly
Imagination is the organ of meaning, teaching us active observation, enhancing our ability to apprehend and comprehend. Seamus Heaney spoke of poetry offering a glimpse and a clarification, here is how an earlier poet Coleridge, put it, when he was writing about what he and Wordsworth were hoping to offer through their poetry, which was “awakening the mind’s attention to the lethargy of custom, and directing it to the loveliness and the wonders of the world before us; an inexhaustible treasure, but for which, in consequence of the film of familiarity and selfish solicitude, we have eyes, yet see not, ears that hear not, and hearts that neither feel nor understand.” All of creation is rife with spiritual meaning, our imagination helps us grasp this fact.
Malcolm Guite is a poet and singer-songwriter living in Cambridge, England where he also works as an Anglican priest and theological academic. He holds an MA in English from Cambridge University, 1980 and a PhD from Durham University in 1993. Chaplain of Girton College, he teaches for the Divinity Faculty in Cambridge. Dr. Guite lectures widely in both the UK and North America. He is the author of several books on literature and theology. His research interests include the intersection of religion and the arts, the examination of the works of J.R.R. Tolkein, C.S. Lewis, Owen Barfield, and British poets such as Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Of note among his books are Faith, Hope and Poetry, Ashgate, 2010; Sounding the Seasons, Canterbury Press, 2013; andThe Word in the Wilderness: A Poem a Day for Lent and Easter, Canterbury Press, 2014, Love Remember: Poems of Loss, Lament and Hope, Canterbury Press, 2017.
As an appetiser, and to give you an idea of my reasons for compiling this anthology here are the opening paragraphs of my introduction: ~Malcolm Guite
Why might we want to take time in Lent, to immerse ourselves in poetry, to ask for the poets as companions on our journey with the Word through the wilderness? Perhaps it is one of the poet’s themselves who can answer that question. In The Redress of Poetry, the collection of his lectures as Oxford Professor of Poetry, Seamus Heaney claims that poetry ‘offers a clarification, a fleeting glimpse of a potential order of things ‘beyond confusion’, a glimpse that has to be its own reward’ (p. xv). However qualified by terms like ‘fleeting’, ‘glimpse’ and ‘potential’, this is still a claim that poetry, and more widely the poetic imagination, is truth-bearing; that it offers not just some inner subjective experience but as Heaney claims, a redress; the redress of an imbalance in our vision of the world and ourselves. Heaney’s claim in these lectures, and in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, is that we can ‘Credit Poetry’, trust its tacit, intuitive and image-laden way of knowledge. I have examined these claims in detail elsewhere (Faith Hope and Poetry) and tried to show, in more academic terms, how the poetic imagination does indeed redress an imbalance and is a necessary complement to more rationalistic and analytical ways of knowing. What I would like to do in this book is to put that insight into practice, and turn to poetry for a clarification of who we are, how we pray, how we journey through our lives with God and how he comes to journey with us.
Lent is a time set aside to re-orient ourselves, to clarify our minds, to slow down, recover from distraction, to focus on the values of God’s Kingdom and on the value he has set on us and on our neighbours. There are a number of distinctive ways in which poetry can help us do that and in particular the poetry I have chosen for this anthology.
Heaney spoke of poetry offering a glimpse and a clarification, here is how an earlier poet Coleridge, put it, when he was writing about what he and Wordsworth were hoping to offer through their poetry, which was
“awakening the mind’s attention to the lethargy of custom, and directing it to the loveliness and the wonders of the world before us; an inexhaustible treasure, but for which, in consequence of the film of familiarity and selfish solicitude, we have eyes, yet see not, ears that hear not, and hearts that neither feel nor understand.”
(Coleridge, Biographia Literaria, Vol. II, pp. 6−7)
Beyond Paralysis: Radical Hope for Morality in a Cynical Age
Professor Emeritus English UBC
Wednesday, March 13 at 4 pm,
UBC Mathematics Building, Room 100
Three quarters of a century after the publication of C. S. Lewis’s The Abolition of Man, moral relativism remains the approach to ethics that dominates the public square. The reductionist (even nihilist) approach to morality and other things that give meaning to human life also continues to shape what our children are taught in school. In the face of this ongoing dominance, it’s imperative that we reassert a case for moral realism and cultivate hope for an ethics transcending a mere exercise of power.
Dennis Danielson (PhD Stanford) is Professor Emeritus and former Head of English at the University of British Columbia. His interests have ranged across literature, religion, the history of science, and ethics. He is a past recipient of UBC’s Killam Prize for research in the humanities, and of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation’s Konrad Adenauer Research Award. His articles have appeared in Mind, Milton Studies, Nature, American Journal of Physics, Journal for the History of Astronomy, and Scientific American. His books include Milton’s Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy(1982), The Book of the Cosmos: Imagining the Universe from Heraclitus to Hawking(2000), The First Copernican: Georg Joachim Rheticus and the Rise of the Copernican Revolution(2006),Paradise Lost and the Cosmological Revolution(2014), and, most recently, The Tao of Right and Wrong: Rediscovering Humanity’s Moral Foundations(2018).
On his recent book, The Tao of Right and Wrong:
“Dennis Danielson’s message in The Tao of Right and Wrong needs to be urgently heeded. … This book should be on every teacher’s reading list.”
—Margaret Somerville, Professor of Bioethics, University of Notre Dame Australia
“The Tao of Right and Wrongis a remarkably compressed and equally lucid exposition of the truths that really count. … The debate in which this book engages is, in the full sense of the term, a fundamental one.”
—Rex Murphy, Commentator for The National Post and formerly for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
“Dennis Danielson marks the 75thanniversary of C.S. Lewis’s classic work The Abolition of Manby updating it for our present situation and applying it to current concerns in a skilful and thought-provoking way. Timely, deft, impressive.”
—Michael Ward, University of Oxford, co-editor of The Cambridge Companion to C.S. Lewis; author, Planet Narnia.
Written in the tradition of The Abolition of Man, C. S. Lewis’s classic work on moral philosophy celebrating its seventy-fifth anniversary in 2018, The Tao of Right and Wrong addresses questions such as what is just? What is right? What is wrong? What purposes, and what virtues, are worth pursuing? And most importantly, how can we weigh answers to these questions without lapsing into, “That’s only your opinion”?
In The Tao of Right and Wrong, Dennis Danielson offers a vigorous primer on moral realism, asserting that humans can and should exercise ethical judgments—and that these judgments are not reducible to subjective opinion, animal instinct, or cultural “construction.” The book is a twenty-first century call for the virtuous cultivation of “humans with hearts,” for a rejection of moral nihilism, and for a life-affirming embrace of moral realism founded in the Tao—the transcultural fund of ultimate postulates that form the very ground of moral judgment, codes of ethics, and standards of right and wrong.
The point is not that animal behaviours have no relevance to our understanding of human nature, but rather that we require a standard of judgment above and beyond that offered by bare biology as a guide to what is morally permissible, advantageous, or obligatory. (39)
The very fabric of our lives is teleological–purpose-driven–in ways that far transcend the disseminating of our genes (though perhaps that is part of it). Therefore, a failure to account for that strong sense and experience of purpose, of goal-directedness, of moral worthwhileness, is a serious failure indeed. It points decisively to a limitation of science as naturalistically conceived and practical….So the inability of naturalistic science to account for the “goods and shoulds” of human moral life might accordingly be treated less as a failure than as blameless omission–a mere innocent incapacity to achieve something that was never part of its competence or job description in the first place. (58, 59)
[Human rights codes] embody, or should embody, or at least reflect, a vision of what it means for human beings to flourish, to fulfill their potential, to cultivate their gifts, to pursue good purposes, to live lives of meaning and justice….Rights codes by themselves, however, are inadequate as a moral foundation….They are no substitute for the cultivation of virtue. (63, 75)
What assumptions are you making about the nature and purpose of human beings, about what constitutes the good life? How does your moral framework promote virtues of beneficence and magnanimity? How does it cultivate human happiness? (76)
Other Scholarship on Moral Realism
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self; A Secular Age; The Language Animal.
Alasdair McIntyre, After Virtue; Three Versions of Moral Inquiry
R. Scott Smith, In Search of Moral Knowledge.
Russ Shafer-Landau, Moral Realism: a Defense.
Miraslov Volf, Flourishing: Why We Need Religion in a Globalized World.
Jim Wallis, The (Un)Common Good.
Dennis Hollinger, Choosing the Good: Christian Ethics in a Complex World..
David Brooks, The Road to Character.
Glenn Tinder Atlantic Monthly 1989 article “Can We Be Good Without God?” which morphed into his book The Political Meaning of Christianity.
Next in GFCF Series
Audio File of Robert Mann’s talk on the Multiverse
Professor Robert Mann, Professor of Physics and Applied Mathematics,
University of Waterloo
The Multiverse, Science and Theology: A Critical Inquiry
January 16, 2019 @ 4:00 pm,
Math Room 100
(Just behind Koerner’s Library)
Thanks to all who participated in this stimulating and thought provoking lecture. We will edit it and post it later this term. ~Gordon for the GFCF Committee
Books on Faith & Physics recommended by Robert Mann:
Sir John Polkinghorne, The Faith of a Physicist: Reflections of a Bottom Up Thinker.
George F. R. Ellis, Before the Beginning: Cosmology Explained
George F. R. Ellis and Nancey Murphy, On the Moral Nature of the Universe: Theology, Cosmology and Ethics.
Professor Mann explains multiverse theory and what implications the acceptance of multiverse theory may have for science and theology. If the multiverse is rejected as an explanation for the particularity of our universe, scientists and theologians are left to address why our particular universe exists rather than every universe.
Robert B. Mann (PhD University of Toronto) is Professor of Physics at the University of Waterloo; he has been a visiting professor at Harvard and Cambridge Universities, and the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics. He is an Affiliate Member of the Perimeter Institute and the Institute for Quantum Computing. Author of over 350 papers, he has received numerous awards, including a Fulbright Fellowship, Teaching Excellence awards from the Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance and from the University of Waterloo, and a Presidential Award of merit from the University of Waterloo. He was chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Waterloo from 2001-2008 and is a past President of the Canadian Association of Physicists (2009-2011) and the Canadian Scientific & Christian Affiliation (1996-2007). He has served on the Advisory Board of the John Templeton Foundation.
His research interests are in black holes, cosmology, particle physics, quantum foundations, and quantum information, as well as the science/religion dialogue. His Waterloo research group looks at these questions:
- How would relativity influence how a quantum computer worked?
- Could we use a quantum probe to peek inside a black hole?
- Is it possible that the Big Bang could be replaced with a black hole at the beginning of time?
Audio File of Robert Mann’s TWU talk Time and Eternity
Part of a TWU, SFU, UBC Tour co-sponsored with CSCA, the Canadian Scientific and Christian Affiliation https://www.csca.ca/vancouver/